Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many arguments show that politicians’ personal information should be confidential
instead
of releasing it on social media. This
essay strongly agrees with this
suggestion because publishing these details could be harmful to their lives
, and might infringe on basic human rights
.
First and foremost, publishing political people
’s private lives
could negatively affect their lives
. It means that these people
can get problems with their mental and physical health if their haters know their address or personal details, and it will be more serious if the journalists try to chase them while
they are driving, which could lead to a crash or accident. For example
, Princess Diana in England passed away in a crash while
she was trying to escape the group of journalists who were chasing her to take her picture and seek information about her personal life.
Furthermore
, it also
infringes on the basic human rights
that everyone has as a human. This
is because they have the rights
to be protected and the right to keep their details. Fix the agreement mistake
right
Thus
, the disclosure of their privacy in newspapers without their agreement can influence their human rights
. For instance
, many Vietnamese politicians cannot
have their freedom whenever they hang out with their family because Verb problem
do not
people
will come to take a photo or record them, which could make them feel uncomfortable and unsafe. Some politicians in this
country always have bodyguards following them to protect them because some overexcited people
could harm their safety and their family
.
In conclusion, some Fix the agreement mistake
families
people
would like to keep political people
’s personal lives
a secret rather than showing them on social media. This
can protect the government's people
’s lives
and ensure that they have human rights
like other people
.Submitted by halenguyenkhanh2005 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Response
Task Response: You have presented a clear and comprehensive argument in favor of keeping politicians’ personal lives confidential. Ensure that your points directly address the prompt and consider presenting a balanced view in future essays for a broader perspective.
Coherence and Cohesion
Coherence and Cohesion: Your essay has a logical structure, with well-supported main points and a clear introduction and conclusion. Focus on smoother transitions between ideas to enhance overall coherence and cohesion.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?