In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the new technology age, a sizable portion of humanity inclines to benefit from online study

instead

of purchasing newspapers or books. I would agree with

this

statement as it is not denied that developed digital resources lead to various advantages in terms of preventing deforestation and easiness of accessibility to readings which I will discuss in

this

essay clearly.

To begin

with, it is a real fact that a host number of trees are consumed

while

producing

Add an article

a

show examples

paper

that is

used for books and newspapers. As plants which are a vital place for the balance of nature are destroyed,

this

extreme deforestation causes a huge carbon emission. If digital reviews are encouraged, people might continue to read e-books and newspapers under trees with healthy air.

For instance

, it has been proven that the main cause of generating carbon gas is paper companies that cut off nature plants to manufacture paper.

Secondly

, online platforms for reading simplify to have access to what is wanted to shoot a glance.

While

the consumption of information in traditional ways a pretty hard, digital platforms

such

as D&R e-books, and Kobo bring more speed and eligibility everywhere.

For instance

, writing down a dissertation is more time-consuming and uncertain by utilizing manual encyclopedias compared to using e-books where any word can be searched with one click. In conclusion, online readings protect both natural plans and the capability to access books. Today's fast world needs effortlessness to find out information regardless of carrying something just through with the internet.

Last

but not least, shifting towards the online is fundamental for sustainability for green nature immersed with trees.