Only government action can solve the housing shortage in big cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, the

issue

of insufficient housing in big

cities

has become increasingly prominent in many different parts of nations. Some people argue that only

governments

can tackle

this

issue

. I strongly agree with

this

view, and I will explain my reasons below.

Firstly

, the housing shortage is closely related to the population in

cities

, and

governments

are uniquely positioned to implement policies to address

this

problem.

For example

, the Chinese government has levied taxes on intercity migration since the early 1990s in order to control the number of citizens contributing to the housing shortage.

Additionally

, the real estate market, which has a significant impact on the scarcity of houses, is largely controlled by

governments

and official departments, not by private individuals. Seoul, the capital city of Korea, is a prime example of

this

, as the government strictly restricts people from investing in the housing market.

While

some may argue that individuals can take actions

such

as moving to suburban areas,

this

only addresses the initial factor of the housing shortage. The primary reason people live in

cities

is because of the availability of qualified job opportunities and proper infrastructure, which cannot be found in suburban or rural areas. In conclusion, I firmly believe that only

governments

can effectively address the

issue

of insufficient housing in big

cities

. Given the significant impact of the population and the real estate market on

this

issue

, it is essential that

governments

take the lead in implementing policies and strategies to solve the problem.