Government investment in the arts ,such as music and theatre,is a waste of money . Government must invest this money in public service instead .do you agree or disagree

Nowadays,the authority tends to invest in crafts,
such
as singing and theatre.It is not a waste of funds . I disagree with
this
,when funds are invested in
arts
it tends to make people have more interest in art creativities and it will make society more knowledgeable about so much about singing,dancing , tradition and culture and
also
building a place where people can come and have a view .These points will be explained with relevant examples and logical conclusions.
To begin
with,
arts
are modes of expression that uses skill or imagination in the creation of aesthetic objects, environments or experience that can be shared with others.The financing technique is
also
beneficial to the public as a whole,it will bring culture and traditions back to our modern days .
For example
,in a school where there is no Fine profession as a subject the children's skills and professions will not be established.
For instance
,Tunde love to draw and paint and the school his attending doesn't have a fine craft teacher ,the child will not focus on other things he will always want to draw and paint something
that is
in his mind as a result of
this
Tunde will be distracted ,will not want to pay attention to any other teaching in the class but if the profession is encouraged and funded by the ministry lot of children skill will be brought out .
Furthermore
,there are various
arts
such
as literature like poetry,drama and story.,
Also
we have visual
arts
like painting, drawing and sculpture.We have modelling, architecture like interior architecture and decorative
arts
like furniture ideas.Moreso,when the government finance
this
different speciality society will not suffer,there will be a lot of skills , handwork and craft to fall back to .For ,example so many families love interior construction for their houses, and furniture drawing
this
is all creativity.
Also
, building a good environment like an amusement park where families can go and relax , and take a good view.The gallery store is not left out ,when more fund is poured into
this
technique it will help the community and provide a lot of handwork, and skilful job to society. In conclusion, funding
arts
is not a waste of assets as it will bring back culture and traditions in modern-day's life .The government's contributions to
this
art will enlighten the community about what they might have forgotten and
also
provide jobs for the population ,like what they can fall back on in future times.
Submitted by oludayotemilade on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • cultural diversity
  • economic stimulus
  • tourism industry
  • social inclusion
  • wellbeing
  • public services
  • infrastructure
  • equitable distribution
  • fiscal responsibility
  • heritage conservation
  • intellectual property
  • private sponsorship
  • government subsidies
  • civic engagement
  • creative industries
What to do next:
Look at other essays: