Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

While

some

people

think producers and superstores should be responsible for lowering the

cost

of packaged commodities, others opine that consumers should no longer purchase those items.

Although

ceasing to patronize shops and owners can bring about low sales for the company, in my opinion, I believe because of

this

reason they should ensure the price of their

goods

is kept at a minimum so as not to drive

customers

away but rather attract more. On the one hand, supermarkets are places where

people

not only get their needed commodities but

also

a place they socialize. The idea manufacturers and retail shops to decrease the stipulated amount of packaging their products so as to make it pocket friendly thereby making the

customers

capable of purchasing the product they want.

For instance

, Shop-rite

together with

Indomie company reduce the price of noodles and

this

move drew a lot of buyers to purchase it freely.

On the other hand

, some other

people

argued that

instead

of purchasing the

goods

individuals should avoid purchasing packaged items that are costly as

this

will serve as an act of rebel against producers which can make them have no other choice than to lower the

cost

of production when

people

stop buying their products.

For example

,

customers

that patronize a shopping mall, Brent, decided not to buy

goods

from them anymore and

this

in turn lowered the rate of their sales,

as a result

, the store had to reduce the

cost

.

To conclude

,

while

imploring manufacturers and supermarkets to lower the price allocated to packaged

goods

to increase

customers

, I believe it can make the consumers stop patronizing them when the

cost

is high thereby reducing their sales output.