Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Agriculture has an integral part in

prosperity

Add an article

the prosperity

show examples

of

socities

Correct your spelling

societies

. It is,

therefore

, not surprising to see how it has caused a controversy among people about whether

countries

should produce their

food

and minimize

import

Fix the agreement mistake

imports

show examples

.

While

some people firmly believe that not all

countries

have arable

land

, others adamantly object to it. I have several solid reasons to agree with supporters one of which is not having arable

land

while

objectors emphasize that it’s a cost-effective solution.

To begin

with, the fervent supporters of

this

matter claim that not all

countries

have arable

land

.

This

is a very convincing argument since every country has a different climate, natural resources or soil type. To elucidate better,

countries

Change preposition

like

show examples

Russia or Qatar cannot develop farming because of extreme weather conditions. From a financial standpoint, it may be argued that

while

it is important to use the country’s budget wisely, it is

also

critical to provide a

waide

Correct your spelling

wide

range of

food

with vitamins, minerals or fibre namely fruit rich in vitamin C like orange.

Furthermore

, it’s worth reiterating that those who are in favour of

this

matter underline the risk of natural disasters or extreme weather conditions

such

as drought and

earthquake

Fix the agreement mistake

earthquakes

show examples

affecting the harvest. In short, they assert that not all

countries

have arable

land

,and as can be clearly seen they are able to present a strong rationale.

In contrast

, a common criticism of the opponents is that it is a cost-effective solution.

Although

their point of view has merits on the surface and

therefore

could be acceptable to an extent, even a cursory observation reveals the major flaws in

this

argument. If the

food

in general is produced locally,

this

may ostensibly lower the prices.

However

, decreasing the price of vegetables or fruit won’t be able to increase

life

Replace the word

living

show examples

standards or GDP. There will still be demand for other products. The most logical explanation as to why the objectors fail to come up with a strong argument is that it is jejune , albeit populist , which is of little avail to the discussion because there is

direct

Add an article

a direct

show examples

correlation between cheaper agricultural products and cheaper

man power

Correct your spelling

manpower

show examples

.

This

can create a snowball effect. All things considered, it can be concluded that not all

countries

have the ideal conditions for producing their

food

and minimizing

import

Fix the agreement mistake

imports

show examples

. The most rational course of action would be to attempt to achieve a balance between the arguments of opponents and proponents