Organized tours to remote places and communities is becoming more and more popular. Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the environment?

People have different views on travelling to some scenic spots which are far away from the city.

While

Linking Words

there are some detrimental impacts on local culture and communities, I do believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. On the one hand, tourists who go on a trip to the suburb would cause some adverse effects on the environment and the residents who live there.

Firstly

Linking Words

, they will damage the surroundings which will break the balance between nature and citizens. Travellers might throw rubbish everywhere and pollute the river and other places.

Besides

Linking Words

, they would bring a lot of noise and

such

Linking Words

stress that local inhabitants cannot suffer from. What’s more, the farmers, who see the chance of earning more money, will abandon their original works and turn to find better jobs, which could a series of problems like producing a number of wastelands.

However

Linking Words

, there are many reasons why I support the idea that tourism is beneficial for the local surroundings.

To begin

Linking Words

with, tourists can bring up the economy of the countryside. They will spend huge amounts of cash which can give every suburban individual a chance to have a decent job and stable income in their career.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, they can know more about the local culture and history, which can easier to protect the characteristics of the place.

In addition

Linking Words

, they can bring much information about cities to villagers and these people who live in the countryside can learn more about urban lives and

thus

Linking Words

contributes to cultural exchange. In conclusion, though it is understandable why more and more people are going to rural regions , it is

also

Linking Words

undeniable that there are more advantages than disadvantages.