Wild animal have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some individuals argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild

animals

because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with

this

point of view.         In my opinion,wild

animals

have a great role in the ecosystem and the balance of life, because each animal has an aspect

that is

closely related to each other. For people to think only of their own benefit is stupidity and the lowest level of humanity. It's true that nowadays people do not feel the need for them, but

this

does not mean that they should be silently watched as they disappear. Preventing their extinction can be achieved by introducing more reserves and tougher penalties for poachers.        

On the other hand

, I condemn some of the actions of the government. Wild

animals

have nowhere to go because we occupied their home and

Wrong verb form

made

show examples

making

Wrong verb form

made

show examples

them move to other places.

For example

, governments are cutting down the forests necessary for nature to build huge and tall buildings,

as a

result

Add the comma(s)

result,

show examples

the

animals

living there leave their shelters and in some

cases

Add a comma

cases,

show examples

they attack people and even young children to avoid starvation.

Moreover

, if human

continues

Add the particle

continues to

show examples

destroy green belts, a pandemic could be expected, since human do not have enough clean air to function respiratory system.             In conclusion,we have no right to decide whether or not wild

animals

should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.If wild

animals

die, humans will

also

suffer from illness.