Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ex-convicts are usually the ones chosen to give speeches in front of forming generations about the dangers of performing criminal activities and

this

Linking Words

usually provokes controversy between people's opinions. I firmly believe that people who were previously incarcerated should give preventive speeches to raise awareness among the youngest ones, which represents the future society that will take the lead.

However

Linking Words

, I think these individuals need to possess certain characteristics in order to talk to teenagers.

Moreover

Linking Words

, they are the correct emitters because of their personal experience which gives credibility to their speech and because they will tend to inspire hope for change. They have gone through a large amount of bad experiences, and have made horrific decisions, but it is precisely what has built their maturity to being able and having enough courage to try again, and to be an example for teenagers and for society because most of the time, even though they have spent a part of their life in jail, that does not mean they are bad persons.

Consequently

Linking Words

, I believe in second chances, and

that is

Linking Words

exactly why they should talk to teens, to make them avoid, at least give them enough information to prevent criminal and illegal activities

Due to

Linking Words

the fact that they already went through hell, their only objective is going to be to instruct with a motivational hopeful message in their speech.

To conclude

Linking Words

, I strongly think that the key to inspiring the next generations to be better every day for themselves and for their loved ones is having a deep conversation with someone who didn’t have the possibility to have a talk with someone who actually cared about them.