Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is acknowledgeable that many
countries
are in a state of penury, hence
the developed are insistent on helping them by providing financial aid,
but doing so does not help poverty. Remove the comma
apply
Therefore
, the rich nations should look for an alternative method to help the poor apart from money. I strongly agree with this
statement because compensating with cash can be more costly and can backfire in numerous ways.
Firstly
, poor countries
should be given other forms of assistance rather than cash as the latter is sometimes more expensive. Poverty can lead to many detrimental factors like homelessness and starvation. While
financial aid may help in some way, many developing nations simply lack the manpower and resources to solve the issue. As a result
, the developed should look for better resolves such
as sending their own workers to increase the quality of the labour force or donating resources like food. For example
, penurious Middle Eastern communities are renowned for their vast land of barren deserts and sparse populations. Consequently
, the wealthy countries
have sent their own helpers to construct houses and donate food, rather than supplying with money.
Secondly
, post-industrial countries
should not rely on funding as a primary form of assistance because it can have a serious harmful impact on them. First and foremost, the main culprit to underdevelopment is inequity. Some societies are known to be corrupt, and unjust, and where they only favour those in the governmental hierarchy. As a consequence
, by compensating poverty with funds, the money would only go to waste as it would not be used to help the impoverished citizens but would only benefit the higher-ups. For instance
, many countries
in Africa are known to be extremely poor by their constant political corruption and guerilla warfare.
In conclusion, whilst money-related charities are often given to poor countries
by developed and are deemed to be helpful. Personally, I believe that this
is not the case as it leads to problems such
as its cost-effectiveness and disadvantages.Submitted by yeshomeclass on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.