Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes .Some people say that personal lifestyle should be made to reduce the damage to environment, while others think that the government should do something to help. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

Many researchers advise that the world stands on the edge of the vanish because of environmental changes. The numerous masses think that

people

should live without compromising with

nature

whereas

others opine that the regime should impose any rule to save it. I think both sections need to contribute to saving the atmosphere.

Firstly

,

nature

is a priority for everyone who lives on the planet. It is the beautiful gift of the god which

people

would pass on from one generation to another by putting their best effort to make it neat and clean rather than using the resources without returning to

nature

.

For example

, to maintain the balance of life ,

people

need to save the planet by growing more plants and trying to reduce pollution from the environment.

Moreover

, if

people

use the resources without restrictions it will disappear from the earth.

However

, governments should be aware of

people

of

nature

by advertising and arranging campaign sites where

people

can stay and enjoy descriptions. Because

nature

is one of the best therapy for stressed or depressed

people

which is recommended by doctors.

For instance

,A survey by a UK university claims that 90% of

people

go under depression through hard and busy life in cities and towns ,

therefore

, many therapists advise

people

to go for outings in remote areas to enjoy the fresh and calm lifestyle. In conclusion,

although

nature

is not demanding from anyone even after giving everything to everyone, it is the basic duty of everybody to take care of the environment to make it clean and green for our betterment.