Some people say that the best way to reduce crime is by using prison sentence To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Recently,crime rates have been increasing sharply all over the world and

this

rate causes lots of environmental problems .

As a result

, the public does not trust anyone because everyone can be a criminal on the streets . Yet , there is some disagreement as to whether the best way to punish

criminals

is behind bars or not .

While

there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary , I personally believe that lockup is necessary for punishment .The reasons to support my view are as follows. First of all, it is an undeniable fact that lockup is the best option rather than

criminals

staying free in the cities . In Turkey ,

for instance

, a murderer who walked with freedom killed his old wife and

that is

why

people

want to collect them to send them to jail .

Moreover

, if the government does not punish organized crime , we can see more victims like that girl .

As a consequence

, the government have to collect

criminals

and give them a punishment who deserved that after that send them behind bars. Equally importantly , though, prison can make them better

people

. Clearly , prisoners can maybe rehabilitate in jail to be better

people

and

after

this

rehabilitation, they can easily adapt to better life standards.

At the end

of the punishment ,

people

trust the old prisoners who can achieve rehabilitation .

On the other hand

, some gangland do not deserve jail because they did not a very big crime

such

as rapist .

That is

to say , these gangland who did petty crimes do not deserve the same sentence as rapists.

However

, a slight sentence is necessary for them

such

as social areas jobs .

To sum up

, I once again restate my view that prison is the best way to punish big

criminals

such

as violent

criminals

.