Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels. Is this a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, it is undeniable that non-renewable

energy

such

as gas and coal are the most used

sources

of

energy

because they play a vital role in economic development,

whereas

in a few countries, the government has started to use solar and wind to replace fossil fuels. Personally, I think

that is

a positive decision that the government can take to make the world a better place.

Although

there is a benefit to the country from using coal or gas as the main source, there are

also

negative impacts on the environment.

Firstly

, waste from the production process of non-renewable

sources

can cause soil and water environmental pollution.

For instance

, if the waste is disposed of in lakes or seas, it will reduce oxygen in the water and can cause bottom-dwelling ecosystems in the form of fish, shrimp, crabs, or other animals to die.

In addition

, The use of fossil fuels can

also

increase the adverse effects

on

Change preposition

of

show examples

global warming where the earth will feel twice as hot as in previous years.

As a result

, ice melting can occur which can submerge the island and abrasion the coast.

However

, I believe that the government should replace the

energy

sources

to avoid more serious environmental damage, it is because alternative

sources

of

energy

are very environmentally friendly and do not produce waste and pollution which

besides

damaging the environment is

also

harmful to human health. They can

also

always be used without worrying that the supply will run out. In conclusion, despite using fossil

flues

Fix the agreement mistake

flue

show examples

, which can harm the environment, I believe that other types of

energy

are safer and more advantageous.