Government should spend money on railways more than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people are highly dependent on transport vehicles for their ordinary and occupational life. Trains and automobiles are two of the most useable sorts of movement.
However
, due to
the undeniable benefits of railway systems over roads, the administrations must fund the railroad more and focus on its expansion. In this
essay, I will illustrate despite a few benefits of the causeways, why the statement is vital for the communities’ socioeconomic progression.
To begin
with, there are many reasons for the development of railways all around the world. Firstly
, the distribution of humans and natural resources globally requires a fast and reliable network of transportation to connect them all. For example
, during the 19th century, the United States began to build a huge railroad all over the country in order to help boost both industry and communication between people. Consequently
, it ended up with the industrialization of the state. A role, which the car industry could not play as well. Secondly
, it has been proven accidents occur less in trains compared with cars. Moreover
, it is more cost-effective and safer to invest in railroad systems rather than causeways.
On the other hand
, there might be some minor disadvantages in accumulating the finances for the subway industry. First and foremost, the higher price and also
the more advanced technology needed may force some governments to invest more in roads to cover their nation’s needs. For example
, many poor African countries, do not have enough resources to buy and deploy trains, instead
, they can build routes and import trucks and cars to meet the demands of their nation.
In conclusion, I restate that The governments should support increasing railways. Because they are safe, fast, and contemporary for public transport and also
very crucial for a nation's development. however
, the minor drawbacks of the statement could be ignored.Submitted by m.lotfipour92 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
The essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic and presents a response to the question. However, the argument could be further developed and supported with more specific examples and counter-arguments.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a logical structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The ideas are presented in a coherent manner, but the essay could benefit from stronger transitions between paragraphs and clearer connections between ideas.
lexical resource
The essay exhibits a good range of vocabulary and uses a variety of language to express ideas. However, there are instances of repetitive vocabulary and the use of some awkward or inaccurate word choices.
grammatical range
The essay demonstrates a good command of grammar and sentence structure. However, there are some errors in subject-verb agreement, verb tense consistency, and sentence construction that affect the overall clarity and coherence of the essay.