Some people say that the government should spend money on measures to save languages that are used by few speakers, while others believe that it is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Most

languages

have fewer speakers.

Therefore

, it continues to be controversial

if

Correct word choice

whether

show examples

the governing body should financially help to salvage their extinction.

Although

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

there are valid points to both views, I am of the opinion that

this

can amount to

waste

Add an article

a waste

show examples

of economic resources, as I will discuss in

this

essay. On the one hand, those who support the idea of spending a country's revenue on tongues with the least native speakers point out that money is the driver of the dialects' popularity.

Language

schools may need to be built and

language

pedagogics may need to be employed in these institutions to teach both foreign and local individuals.

For example

, the French

language

gained more popularity in the twenty-first century

due to

federations' intervention by establishing training centres in every community and

also

inculcating them in school curriculums. To achieve

this

, a large sum of money that private individuals cannot afford will be spent.

Furthermore

, there is the claim that most tribes' cultures and ways of life vanish alongside their

languages

.

As a result

, every financial help required from ministries globally must be rendered to curb

this

phenomenon.

By contrast

, supporters of

this

idea being a waste of resources often say that there are more pressing matters affecting human lives,

for example

, global warming, environmental pollution, insecurity and inflation amongst others. These are termed to be more catastrophic for men and the earth than

language

survival.

Therefore

, financial measures must be implemented more in these areas so as to make the globe a safe haven for every individual. As a

last

point, it may

also

be true that the larger proportion of dialects have no positive effect in the world unlike the few generally accepted speeches like the English and French

languages

. These less known lingo are neither used in the international market nor in the global relation. So, salvaging their death is probably of less importance to the world at large. Conclusively, there are both positive sides to expenditures on saving some

languages

and making expenses on other prevalent occurrences.

Nevertheless

, I stand with the former supporters as there are life-threatening situations occurring around us that need the limited help the leaders can render money-wise.