The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree of disagree with this statement.

One key argument is improving the quality of life of people, should be the most vital goal of

science

above all

. I completely agree with

this

point of view because not only does it require a large amount of funding but

also

currently our natural resources are depleting at a rapid pace. Nowadays, a sizeable amount of

money

is being used in

science

for experiments and discoveries. ,

However

Add a comma

,However

show examples

these funds could be used

otherwise

to solve catastrophic social problems which could destroy human lives in a substantial way.

For example

, if

money

, which is being used for

science

, can be diverted to social work, it will aid in solving the hunger problem easily, which our world has been suffering for decades.

Thus

I think new discoveries should be made through

science

to set human living standards up to a high level which is worth spending

money

on.

Moreover

, in the present-day people are living in a dying world.

For instance

, our natural sources like water, oxygen and forests, which are essential for life, are depleting in a rapid manner.

Therefore

inventing new technologies and developing more sustainable ways to increase these primary needs of humans should be a priority in the

science

field.

Furthermore

, more projects like Space X should be enforced because their aim is to evolve human civilisation to outer space which may be necessary for the survival of the human race. In

conclusion

Add a comma

,conclusion

show examples

I think

science

should prioritize making human lives better because a large amount of

money

is being used in the scientific field which could be relocated

otherwise

and we are living

at the end

stage of our planet which needs new inventions to survive as a race.