Some people believe it is better for governments to spend any available money for sports on providing facilities for the general population. Others believe that instead, they should invest in training top athletes to win major competitions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Public
funds
should be allocated correctly in the field that requires more aid. Therefore
, it should be used for the betterment of the public specifically the money which is supposed to be spent on the sports sector, while
opponents of the notion believe that the wealth should be invested in preparing athletes to achieve a gold medal. In my opinion, some portion of funds
can be used to help people in need yet it is important to help training top sport person.
On the one hand, if public finances are used to develop various infrastructures that can help poor people as shelter or provide them with some meals, it will be beneficial for the development of the country. Certainly, athletics can be sponsored by private companies despite exhausting government funds
on it. In Canada, the poverty rate is very low since authorities serve homeless individuals with at least two meals a day, however
, in the same country most of the tournaments and people in the same field are funded by wealthy industries. As a result
, money should be invested in the sector where it is needed the most, that is
, to fulfil public requirements.
On the other hand
, authorities should finance the training of top athletes to win major competitions as that will give name and fame to the country on a global scale. Consequently
, the reputation of the nation will be improved throughout the world. For example
, in the latest football championship, Argentina won the match as Lionel Messi was the star player who told in an interview that the government has played a major role in his achievement. Thus
, throughout the globe, Argentina is known for its football game, likewise
, if capital is invested in this
field, the nation develops appreciation internationally.
In conclusion, it is often argued that public funds
should be invested whether for providing resources to the citizens or to prepare the national sportsperson. I think it is vital to overlook both segments of the society and distribution should be done impartially.Submitted by emgmei on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Task Response: The essay addresses the prompt and presents both views, but the opinion is somewhat unclear and lacks a clear stance. The response could be more balanced by providing equal weight to both views.
coherence and cohesion
Coherence and Cohesion: The logical structure of the essay is mostly coherent, but there are areas where the transition between ideas could be smoother. Additionally, the conclusion could be more concise and summarize the main points effectively.