One of the widely discussed issues nowadays is whether the
should spend money on railways rather than
.
play
crucialAdd an article
show examples
role in
travelingChange the spelling
show examples
, the number of
has increased significantly in
lastCorrect article usage
show examples
yearsCorrect quantifier usage
show examples
and
phenomenon
leadsWrong verb form
show examples
to high demand for
. Personally,
iChange the capitalization
show examples
believe that
and
should be
firstAdd an article
show examples
priority for
governmentAdd an article
show examples
.
First of all, it is well known that today with the growing population, the demand for transport in general is growing too.
, people tend to choose
over public transport and
because they are more comfortable and mobile.
, nowadays
have become more cheaper and available. The
cannot reduce the number of private
, but it can provide them with quality
and routes, thereby decreasing traffic in cities.
, in my
what the
should do is spend money on road expansion, adding new routes and reconstructing old ones.
, global warming and other ecology issues make us think about the environmental friendliness of transport. But, in
digitilizedCorrect article usage
show examples
it is not
secretCorrect article usage
show examples
that the most eco-friendly
vehicleFix the agreement mistake
show examples
are
. Unlike
, private
have become more revolutionized and environmentally friendly with emerging technology and new types of fuel.
, there are new cutting-edge car models
as Tesla which use energy as a fuel,
still use petrol or diesel releasing greenhouse gases. It makes
more appropriate for
usingChange the form of the verb
show examples
in the future.
In conclusion, taking everything mentioned into account, in our final analysis we can say that
should spend money on
and
carFix the agreement mistake
show examples
more than on railways
,Remove the comma
show examples
because it can help to solve crucial problems
as high traffic and environmental issues