Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Whilst some

people

are of the view that the leading authorities should allocate money for

arts

referring to music and theatre. Others believe that governments should address their funding to public services

instead

of spending it on recreational activities. In my opinion, I totally agree that public services merit government funding more than

arts

.

On the other hand

, it is undeniable that the

arts

provide

people

with entertainment and yield various psychological rewards

such

as relief from stress;

however

, art institutions are more likely to attract investment from the private sector.

Therefore

, these facilities can generate their own profit without governmental financial assistance.

For example

, in 2014,

according to

an article published in The New York Times, about 80% of the concerts that were held in the summertime earned more than 3 million dollars.

Thus

, business

people

prefer to invest in the

arts

more than anything else.

On the other hand

, it is evidently clear that public sectors

such

as schools, roads, and hospitals determine the quality of life for the citizens.

In other words

, if the government ignored these vital facilities,

people

would live unhealthy and unfulfilled lives.

For instance

,

according to

a questionnaire administered by researchers at Chicago University, the vast majority of students need a bigger library as the current one is almost always busy all the time, but they did not ask for a park or playing field. In conclusion, in light of what has been discussed,

although

recreational activities are of high value for one’s well-being, it is still not deserving of government spending. It is highly recommended that the construction of public facilities should be given the foremost consideration.