The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

It is stated that the top priority of

science

should be to advance

people

's lives.

Although

others might disagree, I believe despite the presented view,

scientists

should focus on other priorities. Some stated that advancing human life is the most important issue for

scientists

. Most importantly,

science

was discovered by man. So it would not be a far-fetched idea to think of

science

as just an instrument in

people

's wardrobes.

Scientists

are the foundation of knowledge.

Such

foundations need to be taken care of. If

this

foundation excels, the whole system will rise.

For example

, the development of medical

science

is a big factor in preserving

people

's lives which helps the whole cycle. I believe other aims might be more important than improving human life as others have stated.

Therefore

,

science

needs to be unbiased.

While

scientists

should be curious to examine mother nature,

science

should be a reference for free research into the universe. The obligation to focus

science

only on human lives will act as a big limit on scientific evolution.

Such

freedom would able

scientists

to develop knowledge beyond its restrictions.

Furthermore

,

science

is not a tool for man's use only.

Such

an ability might be used to address the planet, environment, and animals altogether.

Due to

human's capability to exceed the known, it is their responsibility to preserve what has been given.

This

preservation is not only for

people

's next generations to come, it is

also

for others who share

this

planet with them. In conclusion, I believe that despite the origin of

scientists

, as we are not alone on

this

planet and

science

-free nature, prioritizing the environment's needs

instead

of human life improvement is a more demanding issue.