It is believed that the education system is the most critical factor to the development of a country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this belief?

It’s

often thought that education is the base of a county’s growth . I somewhat agree with that statement. It has an influence on improvement but might not be the only

way

to develop.

Firstly

, schools universities and other teaching institutions provide people with knowledge that will be needed in their job. By allocating money for that, the country can expand its income

while

solving the problem of poverty and hunger.

This

way

it’s

possible to reduce unemployment either.

For instance

, India started a new project on renovating the study system in the sixties. They have made a new conclusive exam and evaluation method, that was similar to

countries

that had high literacy

rate

Fix the agreement mistake

rates

show examples

. That has shown dramatic progress in society and future income. Even though India is still poor and has a low economy, they overrun some other

countries

with destitution. In my opinion, they’re in the

way

of advancement because of changes in the teaching scheme.

On the other hand

, I think

it’s

not an obligation to make education a priority. There are plenty of other things that show the critical impact on growth.

For instance

,

countries

that live in central Asia and in the middle east are rich in fossils. One of them is Kazakhstan which keeps its economy high through international trade.

This

country is not different in the complexity of literate resources and still keeps obsolete methods in pedagogy. Despite ,that

it’s

still one of the developing

countries

. To summarise the above, I agree that education is a crucial factor for social advancement and can be the reason for high progress, but

this

is not the only

way

to make it.