In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for veey fast trains between cities. Other believes the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion
A country’s prosperity heavily relies on the strength and connectivity of its transportation systems.
While
some argue that investing in the construction of new railway
lines to connect major cities more quickly is essential, others believe that enhancing the current infrastructure
is a more practical approach. I agree with the latter, as developing existing systems is often less costly and faster to implement.
New railway
lines with high-speed trains between cities could indeed support trade, commerce, and business. However
, the associated costs are substantial. Building new infrastructure
requires not only additional railway
stations and tracks but also
advanced technology and high-speed train engines to operate the system. This
demands a trained workforce and significant financial investment. As a result
, ticket prices for such
services might need to be higher to offset these expenses, potentially deterring public use. Additionally
, the time needed to plan and construct a completely new railway
network could take years, delaying public access and returns on investment.
Conversely
, improving the existing public transport
infrastructure
is both cost-effective and quicker to achieve. With current infrastructure
and technology in place, upgrades can be either minor or major, depending on need. Minor repairs to buses, trains, and roadways could revitalize the transport
system, making it more efficient and affordable for the public. Countries with well-utilized public transport
often show higher economic productivity, as more people—including wealthier individuals—opt for public transit. Moreover
, enhancing current systems allows for a
swift implementation, Remove the article
apply
such
as adding new buses, expanding routes, or cleaning and updating bus stops, which can yield immediate improvements in public satisfaction and commuter convenience.
In conclusion, while
constructing new railway
lines may appeal to some, I believe that the cost and time involved make it a less practical choice. Investing in improvements to the existing transport
infrastructure
is a more efficient and effective way to make public transit widely accessible, affordable, and profitable.Submitted by mbasheerdange on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Consider supporting your points with more specific examples, data, or case studies to strengthen the argument further.
coherence cohesion
Incorporate clearer transitions between paragraphs to enhance flow. Use linking phrases like 'Moreover,' or 'However,' more consistently.
task response
The essay provides a balanced discussion of both views and supports the final opinion effectively.
coherence cohesion
Each paragraph is logically structured with a clear main idea that is developed effectively, allowing the reader to follow the argument seamlessly.
coherence cohesion
The introduction sets the stage well, and the conclusion effectively wraps up the essay by reinforcing the writer's viewpoint.
Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
You should use complex sentences in your writing, but it does not mean that you should try to make all of our sentences complex.
‘Complex’ sentences are not actually very complex; they are just two or more simple sentences put together. Putting them together makes the essay more coherent and cohesive.
Examples:
I really want to study but I’m too tired.
I wore a warm coat because the weather was cold.
If action is not taken soon on climate change, global warming will get worse.