I firmly disagree that an individual should be held responsible for his own health and medical benefits are not provided for free irrespective of an individual's social status, as few treatments can be extremely expensive and some natural incidents are
also
out of a person's reach.
Linking Words
To begin
with, free health care benefits are important to bear high-cost treatments, especially for the ones who cannot afford them. Having Linking Words
such
services, Linking Words
people
might not want to suffer till death as their bills will be automatically taken care of. Use synonyms
For instance
, Linking Words
people
suffering from cancer can be saved if proper therapies like chemo and radiation are well offered on time, but as these procedures are really costly, they are not really left with any choice. Use synonyms
As a result
, providing free medical benefits can help reduce the mortality rate drastically.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, it is true that a person's well-being should be his utmost priority but there are certain parameters that can not be controlled Linking Words
such
as natural calamities and accidents. To cite an example, thousands of Linking Words
people
lost their lives and got injured Use synonyms
due to
a series of earthquakes that occurred in Istanbul Linking Words
this
year. It has harmed one-third of the nation's population and we cannot really blame anyone for the same.
Linking Words
To sum up
, it is fair to believe that a person should take care of his own health, but, in today’s world, external factors have a significant effect on one’s well-being. Linking Words
However
, in my opinion, the government should start a few schemes where needy Linking Words
people
are benefitted medically. I believe the aforementioned points are strongly supporting my viewpoints.Use synonyms
jyotiarora940