Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Bad

situations

are part of

life

. Without challenging ,

situations

one cannot realize their potential and move forward in

life

while

these scenarios discourage few and they lose the race of

life

. It is frequently believed that unsatisfactory and low pay jobs should not be accepted by employers. One should get the pay

according to

their education and academics. People think that if they earn a degree by spending a lot of effort and time

then

it must be worth it

for example

, if doctors spend five years of education and just get minimal pay in a non-professional and pathetic working environment

that is

what’s the purpose of hard work.

Moreover

, it is

also

argued by many debaters that in

this

condition of inflation, the non-employment and a competitive world it is better to accept jobs with no perks and low pay.

Additionally

, nowadays, people

also

believe that salaries fulfil the basic requirements of

life

and after losing that source of income there are no other opportunities for employers. So it’s beneficial to accept the bad situation. In my opinion, an organization that does not compensate for your efforts and time will be not good enough and deserve good employment.

Also

in these ,conditions employers should leave the job,

furthermore

, continuing efforts and fighting for survival are the characteristics that make humans alive and active. So in bad ,situation people should fight about conditions because without zero input you cannot change anything Conclusively in some

situations

, it is wise to accept a bad situation and make a move at the right time

while

in challenging conditions it's essential to show your spirit. Bad

situations

are part of

life

and

along with

positive energy and intelligence, anyone can kill the problems.