A number of citizens consider that producers and
would rather take responsibility for decreasing how much packaging of products.
others contend that
have more impact relying on pretending to pay for much-packaged
.
essay aims to discuss the logic behind viewpoints
,Remove the comma
show examples
and
presents why I believe both given ideas are of equal importance, and neither should be encouraged at the expense of the other, it would rather be combined together.
On the one hand, those who are in favour of the view that
and
are responsible for the decrease
ofChange preposition
show examples
packaging products have their own reasoning. More specifically,
the environment status in
worldAdd an article
show examples
recently, it is obvious that more and more people notice
about Change preposition
show examples
environmentReplace the word
show examples
protection,
, if the producers have the reduction of producing packaging
, there will be numerous highly remarkable responses from the
, it will not only help to protect the environment but
build a sympathetic brand’s image. Because
are all necessary, people have to buy them undoubtedly, so
that Correct word choice
show examples
should be produced in an eco-friendly process, including using no plastic packaging or even no packaging.
, if there are no more packaged
in the market, the
absolutely can not purchase any packaged products.
, it is understandable why others suppose that it would be better if the
pretend to use
with a lot of packaging. The most convincing reason is that
can let the
and
cut the amount of packaging. As it is considerably hard to make the
and
reduce or even cut the use of packaging of commodities,
, it is reasonable that
have more impact on
issue. If there is no one paying for those packaged commodities, the
will certainly decrease or even stop manufacturing packaging, and if
bring their own packaging, containers made from fabric or environmentally friendly materials,
will not use any harmful packaging.
In conclusion, both views have their own rationales, and they are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
, I contend that the optimal approach should be to adopt the
manufacturersChange noun form
manufacturer's
manufacturers'
show examples
and
’ reduction of the amount of packaging and the prevention of
’ expenditure on commodities with lots of packaging