Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A number of citizens consider that producers and

supermarkets

would rather take responsibility for decreasing how much packaging of products.

While

others contend that

customers

have more impact relying on pretending to pay for much-packaged

goods

.

This

essay aims to discuss the logic behind viewpoints

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and

then

presents why I believe both given ideas are of equal importance, and neither should be encouraged at the expense of the other, it would rather be combined together. On the one hand, those who are in favour of the view that

manufacturers

and

supermarkets

are responsible for the decrease

of

Change preposition

in

show examples

packaging products have their own reasoning. More specifically,

due to

the environment status in

world

Add an article

the world

show examples

recently, it is obvious that more and more people notice

about

Change preposition

apply

show examples

environment

Replace the word

environmental

show examples

protection,

hence

, if the producers have the reduction of producing packaging

goods

, there will be numerous highly remarkable responses from the

customers

, it will not only help to protect the environment but

also

build a sympathetic brand’s image. Because

goods

are all necessary, people have to buy them undoubtedly, so

that

Correct word choice

apply

show examples

goods

should be produced in an eco-friendly process, including using no plastic packaging or even no packaging.

For example

, if there are no more packaged

goods

in the market, the

customers

absolutely can not purchase any packaged products.

On the other hand

, it is understandable why others suppose that it would be better if the

customers

pretend to use

goods

with a lot of packaging. The most convincing reason is that

customers

can let the

manufacturers

and

supermarkets

cut the amount of packaging. As it is considerably hard to make the

manufacturers

and

supermarkets

reduce or even cut the use of packaging of commodities,

therefore

, it is reasonable that

customers

have more impact on

this

issue. If there is no one paying for those packaged commodities, the

manufacturers

will certainly decrease or even stop manufacturing packaging, and if

customers

bring their own packaging, containers made from fabric or environmentally friendly materials,

supermarkets

will not use any harmful packaging. In conclusion, both views have their own rationales, and they are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

Therefore

, I contend that the optimal approach should be to adopt the

manufacturers

Change noun form

manufacturer's

manufacturers'

show examples

and

supermarkets

’ reduction of the amount of packaging and the prevention of

customers

’ expenditure on commodities with lots of packaging