A number of citizens consider that producers and 
 would rather take responsibility for decreasing how much packaging of products. 
 others contend that 
 have more impact relying on pretending to pay for much-packaged 
. 
 essay aims to discuss the logic behind viewpoints
,Remove the comma
show examples
  and 
 presents why I believe both given ideas are of equal importance, and neither should be encouraged at the expense of the other, it would rather be combined together.
On the one hand, those who are in favour of the view that 
 and 
 are responsible for the decrease 
ofChange preposition
show examples
  packaging products have their own reasoning. More specifically, 
 the environment status in 
worldAdd an article
show examples
  recently, it is obvious that more and more people notice 
about Change preposition
show examples
 environmentReplace the word
show examples
  protection, 
, if the producers have the reduction of producing packaging 
, there will be numerous highly remarkable responses from the 
, it will not only help to protect the environment but 
 build a sympathetic brand’s image. Because 
 are all necessary, people have to buy them undoubtedly, so 
that Correct word choice
show examples
  should be produced in an eco-friendly process, including using no plastic packaging or even no packaging. 
, if there are no more packaged 
 in the market, the 
 absolutely can not purchase any packaged products. 
, it is understandable why others suppose that it would be better if the 
 pretend to use 
 with a lot of packaging. The most convincing reason is that 
 can let the 
 and 
 cut the amount of packaging. As it is considerably hard to make the 
 and 
 reduce or even cut the use of packaging of commodities, 
, it is reasonable that 
 have more impact on 
 issue. If there is no one paying for those packaged commodities, the 
 will certainly decrease or even stop manufacturing packaging, and if 
 bring their own packaging, containers made from fabric or environmentally friendly materials, 
 will not use any harmful packaging. 
In conclusion, both views have their own rationales, and they are not necessarily mutually exclusive. 
, I contend that the optimal approach should be to adopt the 
manufacturersChange noun form
manufacturer's
manufacturers'
show examples
  and 
’ reduction of the amount of packaging and the prevention of 
’ expenditure on commodities with lots of packaging