Some feel governments should invest in preserving minority languages, while others feel this is not a good use of resources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Insignificant
languages
worldwide have been greatly controversial in the awareness of governments that have to retain them for friendship among different people. Some views of citizens
have had negative attitudes toward the minor group of languages
by not conserving them. I strongly believe that this
is an issue of conflict and generates chaos or unhappiness in societies in the global nation. It will be thoroughly examined in the following essay.
The conservation of rare things is more significant to the country's stability, such
as ancient places, the old history of sculptures, and ethnicities, including local speaking, which
should be protected from the ethnic governments. Because the authorities of governments can rescue the unique Correct pronoun usage
apply
languages
of local people, it has benefited in several ways in lifting the level of national quality. For example
, when the government has established preservation policies for small languages
, that can reduce domestic racism. Those laws can also
raise equal life, such
as education, healthcare, society, and economics.
On the paradoxical side, some citizens
have ignored retaining different languages
, which has been a drawback to destruct the relationships of local people. For instance
, the higher class insulted traditional languages
for a long time and all the time. Furthermore
, the mistake of racist thinking of unpolished adolescents by parents can impact the local citizens
in the future. Therefore
, providing accurate information expands on websites, papers, books, and news about them, and is the best way to avoid this
conflict.
In conclusion, I confidently think that the government and the involved organizations ought to help to edit or think elaborately about the conservation of trivial or scarce languages
of the countryside citizens
.Submitted by kanchanakularathna1991 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
The essay addresses the task but lacks a clear and comprehensive response. Try to elaborate on both views with equal weight and provide a more balanced argument.
task response
Some ideas are clear, but the essay would benefit from more detailed explanations and examples. Be sure to develop each point fully to improve clarity.
coherence cohesion
Logical structure of the essay needs improvement. Ensure each paragraph has a clear main idea and that the progression between ideas is smooth and logical.
task response
Work on providing more specific examples and explanations to support your points. This will strengthen your arguments and make them more compelling.
coherence cohesion
Although an introduction and conclusion are present, they could be more effective. Make sure your introduction clearly outlines the essay's structure, and your conclusion should succinctly summarize your main points and restate your opinion.
coherence cohesion
The essay demonstrates a good understanding of both views regarding the preservation of minority languages.
task response
The writer's opinion is clearly stated and provides a central point around which the essay is structured.
task response
The essay shows an attempt to provide relevant examples, which is important for supporting your arguments.