Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement??

Nowadays, government expenditure has increased not only for public services but

also

for the

arts

. In my opinion, I agree that it is important to spend money on public services.

However

, I

also

believe that union consumption

on

Change preposition

of

show examples

arts

is essential and not a waste of wealth.

To begin

with, ministry investment in public investments evidently has its benefits. It helps to improve the quality of life, reduce the death rate, improve the literacy rate and promote the development of infrastructure.

For instance

, disbursement on healthcare facilities ensures clean drinking water and proper medical care.

As a result

, improving the health of the society.

Similarly

, if the authority spends capital on education and infrastructure, it protects the children’s right to free education.

This

helps in increasing the literacy level and reducing poverty.

On the contrary

,

this

does not mean that

arts

must be neglected. First and foremost,

cost

Correct article usage

the cost

show examples

on

Change preposition

of

show examples

arts

helps to promote the culture and lifestyle of a country.

Consequently

, it attracts many tourists who are curious to learn about different cultures, thereby generating income for the economy.

Similarly

, many renowned artists have won Nobel prizes for their contributions to the field of art and literature.

Lastly

, union investment becomes essential for those institutions which are not able to generate enough cash and are forced to shut down. In conclusion, there are clear advantages to spending a large amount of government money on public services. That said, I strongly disagree that spending money on

arts

is a waste as it not only serves as a source of entertainment but

also

helps to improve the quality of life.