29.Some people say economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger, while others say economic growth is damaging the environment and must stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people assert that
countries
should focus exclusively on developing economies so as to eliminate poverty,
whereas
others believe that development leads to environmental problems and
therefore
should be suspended. It looks to me that it is only a question of different emphasis: both views have their justifications depending on the need of different
countries
. On the one hand, it makes sense that impoverished
countries
should prioritize economic growth over environmental impacts. From the perspective of advocates for
this
viewpoint, the issue that drains these nations is not their flora and fauna habitats but rather their backward economies.
This
includes low productivity in farming, insufficient investment in infrastructure,
as well as
millions of deaths
due to
hunger and diseases. Considering
this
, it is considered of paramount importance to stimulate economic growth in order to provide the necessary funds to tackle these issues. One convincing example is China, where the roaring economic rise during the past half-century has witnessed a dramatic decrease in its poor population and the elimination of famines.
While
the argument has its role to play in less developed regions, it is not justified enough to silence those environmentalists protesting on the streets in industrialized
countries
who have already experienced the detrimental ramifications
coupled with
economic rewards. In America,
for example
, it is the popularity of private cars that has become a major culprit for increasing carbon dioxide emissions.
Also
, addressing the pernicious impacts of some industrial projects might overwhelmingly outweigh their contribution to the tax system.
This
is
due to
long-term soil erosion and contamination of rivers caused by hazardous pollution. From an economic perspective,
this
concern
also
begets the claim that flourishing should not come at the sacrifice of the environment. In conclusion, each statement has its justification from a certain perspective. I would say that emerging economies could draw lessons from industrialized
countries
' experiences in dealing with the relationship between development and ecological systems.
Therefore
, they should initiate a more comprehensive strategy that meets their demands.
Submitted by y2083749065 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Economic growth
  • Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
  • Infrastructural development
  • Social services
  • Quality of life
  • Trickle-down effect
  • Poverty alleviation
  • Industrialization
  • Deforestation
  • Climate change
  • Biodiversity
  • Resource depletion
  • Sustainable growth
  • Renewable energy
  • Wellbeing indices
  • Environmental protection
  • Technological advancements
  • Global responsibility
  • Consumer behavior
  • Green technology
What to do next:
Look at other essays: