Every state should have the right to free
trade
in local or export things without limitations from authority. I partially agree with Use synonyms
this
statement, Linking Words
due to
the fact that both arguments have beneficial and negative affect on society.
On the one hand, in developed countries importing products without controlling and putting some diminution by the government might lead to poor quality items. Linking Words
Subsequently
, all suppliers will check the condition of it. Linking Words
For instance
, huge countries like China or the USA cannot control all factories' manufacturing quality. Eventually, there are put some Linking Words
restrictions
on the seller in order to keep stable economic growth.
Use synonyms
On the other hand
, there are numerous benefits to people on free Linking Words
trade
on import. Use synonyms
Firstly
, new business starters who start with a small amount of budget cannot follow government Linking Words
restrictions
. Use synonyms
For example
, exporting cotton had prohibited in Uzbekistan. Linking Words
As a result
, year by year growing cotton has been going down because demand is low and price Linking Words
also
is minimal.
Linking Words
Secondly
, doing monopoly in local Linking Words
trade
is easier by putting Use synonyms
restrictions
. Use synonyms
For example
, the window manufacturing company “IMZO” do a monopoly because the tax rate is high installed by the authorities of Uzbekistan. Linking Words
Subsequently
, Linking Words
this
company does not have competitors and the price for windows is high.
Linking Words
To conclude
, putting Linking Words
restrictions
on Use synonyms
trade
has some drawbacks like controlling the quality. Use synonyms
However
, the advantages overcame the disadvantages and have a good impact on society. I believe business people should Linking Words
trade
without any Use synonyms
restrictions
.Use synonyms
g.ulugbek14