In many situations, people who break the law should be warned instead of punished. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In today's modern, world most people are not following rules and regulations, and because of that, more and more individuals are encouraged to break the laws whether it's traffic rules or any other crimes, So to stop breaking the laws humankind should be warned first and if they did the same mistake twice,

then

only they should be punished and I agree with

this

and in

this

essay, I will discuss why I agree to the above statement with some valid reasons. Starting today, the crime rate is reaching over the sky, and because of that, victims have to face the challenges of theft. The reason for

this

is a conflict between two or more individuals over the necessity of food and water, and to survive in

this

expensive world they are compelled to do cheap things like robbery and doing illegal business. So first law empowerment should understand the motive behind the crime before punishing the offender, and at that time the accuser should give a warning first and

then

if, they commit it again

then

only they should be punished.

For instance

, a report conducted by the Indian police department, states that more than 60% of crimes are robbery or cheating.

Furthermore

, if a big crime is committed like murder, or drug trafficking,

then

only humans should be punished. At that time, strict action will be taken against the perpetrator and if necessary

then

, a death sentence will be given. So, all citizens should be given a chance to explain the reason behind committing corruption.

To conclude

, in my way of thinking, special force should be made and they will have a right to find the reason behind the offence ,

then

only under the law

empowered

Verb problem

should

show examples

the offender

should

Verb problem

apply

show examples

be either given a warning or punished based on the violation.