Houses are essential for people. Some people think that the government should offer free houses for people who cannot afford to pay for it. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued whether the government should supply apartments for free for

people

in poverty.

According to

a few individuals, it’s necessary for the government to do so, because living safely is

such

important for human beings. From my point of view, I agree with

this

statement not only because living is one of the basic rights for humans but

also

due to

this

action can solve the detrimental poverty issue between wealthy

people

and the poor by diminishing the differences.

Firstly

, if politicians are willing to offer

houses

for free to help those who struggling to find a place to live,

then

the whole

society

will become safe and sound.

For example

, the population of homeless will declined dramatically

due to

this

reasonable policy which eventually can bring a far safer

society

as well as

a friendly environment for other citizens to live with.

Secondly

, if the poor can live in

houses

that are provided by public services, they can

fulfill

Change the spelling

fulfil

show examples

their need for living dignity.

As a result

, the unbalanced living quality between wealthy

people

and poor

people

can be fixed.

For instance

, the costs of building free

houses

can be covered by the taxes paid by rich businessmen and landlords.

On the other hand

, by being willing to build up

such

important social services,

then

society

creates a safety net to catch those who failed to maintain their basic need to survive. In conclusion, I completely agree with the idea that the government should view offering

houses

for the poor as their priority

as well as

responsibility.

In other words

,

this

little step forward, can bring remarkable changes to

society

and

subsequently

make the world a better place.