Throughout history, male leaders have led us into violence and conflict. If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Leaders

play a crucial role in

society

's development.History depicts,that male

leaders

, tend to be more chaotic and can lead to violence and disputes .

In contrast

,if a

society

is ruled by a female it would be more tranquil.I completely disagree with

this

point of view.

This

dissertation will elaborate on the reasons behind my opinion.

Leadership

not only demands patience but

also

requires an obstinate attitude to succeed through hurdles.Men are considered to be more pragmatic.

This

,

however

,plays in their favour and enables them to have a solid grasp of myriad problems.

For instance

, research conducted just before the 2021 elections illustrated that people consider males to be more efficient

leaders

.

This

opinion is completely preposterous and holds no significance as male

leaders

have always been cheered upon for their strategic approach concerning their people.

On the other hand

,if,

society

is ruled by female

leaders

it might be peaceful but it wouldn't be that prosperous.That being said,women tend to have temper problems and lose patience over trivial matters.

Moreover

, females tend to be less practical and more imaginative which is a negative point if we are talking about

leadership

.To exemplify, females being philanthropists can contribute to a serene

society

but it's not only the

leadership

quality

that is

in demand.

To sum up

,I would say that anyone with strong

leadership

qualities can rule the community but in my very personal opinion,males have more ruling capabilities than a female.

Subsequently

,it would be absurd to condemn male

leaders

of violence and conflict when they have been successfully governing

society

for quite a time now.