The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 avout one university. Summarise the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates positive

assessment

Fix the agreement mistake

assessments

show examples

about getting good

score

Fix the agreement mistake

scores

show examples

for different aspects of a university. For the teaching quality, electronic

resources

and teaching quality are getting increased as the year

go

Change the verb form

goes

show examples

by between 2000-2010,

however

Add a comma

,however

show examples

the range of modules decreased slightly as the year goes.

According to

the chart in 2000, students gave good

feedbacks

Fix the agreement mistake

feedback

show examples

on print

resources

at 85% meanwhile the pupils give poor feedback on the range

on

Change preposition

of

show examples

modules offered and electronic

resources

at 32% and 45%. As the

years

go on, between 2000-2005 there was

decrease

Add an article

a decrease

show examples

of 2 %

for

Change preposition

in

show examples

teaching quality

however

it went back to 69% in 2010.

Also

, the electronic

resources

increased a lot throughout the 10

years

like

Change preposition

as

show examples

shown in the bar above, the percentage in 2000 was 45%

while

in 2010 was 85%.

Subsequently

, the rate for buildings or facilities remain constant throughout the

years

at 77% In conclusion, there was

improvement

Add an article

an improvement

show examples

for

Change preposition

in

show examples

some areas in the survey rates except the modules offered in all the

years

that the survey took place.