Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

History tells us what has happened before our time. One of the things that give us a great understanding of how local communities lived are historic

buildings

Use synonyms

and as

such

Linking Words

we should try to preserve our heritage at all costs. I believe that replacing

such

Linking Words

artefacts can be detrimental to societies. The destruction of historic

buildings

Use synonyms

can cause a major loss of history. The construction of a building gives an insight into the daily lives and activities that took place there.

For instance

Linking Words

, the Colosseum in Rome tells us that it was a site where battles took place between champions

as well as

Linking Words

the bathhouses, in the city of Bath, showing how the British folk took to bathing. Destroying these establishments would erase

such

Linking Words

knowledge,

Additionally

Linking Words

, maybe even the identity of a community.  These days the modern look is in. People no longer want an outdated style

this

Linking Words

extends to architecture

as a result

Linking Words

sites that hold historic value are in danger. Controversially I

however

Linking Words

think that the modernisation of

buildings

Use synonyms

lacks character and wipes away the storytelling these older

buildings

Use synonyms

give as a solution the

buildings

Use synonyms

just need to install modern amenities.

For example

Linking Words

, air conditioning allows visitors to cool down and explore structures. Charging ports allows the public to power up the devices for memorable Pictures. These slight changes allow more foot traffic.

To sum up

Linking Words

, in my opinion, I do not agree that places that have historic meaning should be replaced just up-kept so that people could still visit to appreciate and gain wisdom.