When designing a building, the most important factor is the intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Architects are often struggling to decide whether the design of a construction should be based on its form and

beauty

or its functionality. In

this

essay, I will argue that the intended use ought to be considered the most important factor in building a structure as it is the essential factor for its residents

as well as

the fact that

beauty

trends would wear off over

time

. One of the main reasons for the preference for function over outward appearance is the people who will use the building. In spite of enjoying aesthetics, they have more pragmatic concerns as to whether the construction can perform their services,

such

as its safety or its capability to withstand any kind of load or even functionality of elevator and sufficiency of rooms.

By contrast

, if only aesthetic values were concerned in the design

while

neglecting serviceability, the residents would suffer the consequences.

Moreover

, standards of

beauty

change rapidly.

This

is because people’s tastes alter as

time

goes by, and

as a result

, the aesthetic values of buildings would wear off over

time

and be supplanted by other forms of

beauty

.

For instance

, the implementation of Granit sand on constructions as their facade was extremely popular in the 1990s

whereas

other types of facade decorations have now superseded it.

Hence

, as the novelty of the outward appearance of structures reduces over

time

, it is logical to invest more in functionality rather than

beauty

. In conclusion, I would argue that the main focus of structural designers should be on the practicality and serviceability of the building on the grounds that performance is crucial for people who live in it;

in addition

to spending on appearance being vain as it will lose its value over

time

.