All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that

cars

powered by electricity are more advantageous than traditional

cars

which burn petrol. I partially agree with

this

opinion and believe that traditional

cars

should not be substituted with new power

cars

completely. On the one hand, electronic vehicles should be adopted by the global market and consumers because it is eco-friendly. Without burning traditional fuels, those

cars

can reduce carbon emissions, and thereby, mitigate the global warming issue, which is mainly caused by the emission of modern

cars

.

For example

,

according to

research, compared with traditional vehicles, electronic

cars

produced by Tesla can generate less greenhouse gas, and

this

is the major reason why Tesla can shock the market with its surprisingly increasing demand.

On the other hand

,

cars

burning traditional fuels should still have their share in the market for a long time.

That is

because traditional

cars

have relatively lower costs in capital and more mature producing technology, leading to a lower price and more comfortable driving experience when compared with new power

cars

.

As a result

,

this

type of car is affordable for low-income families and can provide convenience to their normal life.

For example

, even though Tesla is prevalent in some developed countries, traditional car brands

such

as Honda and Toyota are still reporting increasing sales in South Asia and India. In conclusion, from my perspective,

although

electronic vehicles are environmentally friendly and can benefit the well-being in the long term, traditional

cars

parallelly contribute value to poor families and should not be replaced completely.