The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides information about the ratio of four different products that were refurbished between 1982 and 2010.

Overall

Linking Words

, it can be seen that there are four selected materials for recycling they are Plastic and cardboard, Glass containers, Aluminium cans and Plastics. The paper

items

Use synonyms

rate was at its peak and the plastic rate was in decline in refurbishing.

To begin

Linking Words

,with the cardboard had a zigzag trend.

Moreover

Linking Words

, the paper and board were straightforward to refurbish. In the ,beginning it has 60% of

items

Use synonyms

for recycling and at ,

last

Linking Words

it has 70% of products.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, the glass container materials show an upward fluctuation.

In addition

Linking Words

, the glass pieces were 50% at first and

at the end

Linking Words

of

time

Add a comma

,time

show examples

it was 60%.

Secondly

Linking Words

, the aluminium can

items

Use synonyms

were the only

one

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

product which has an upward trend.

However

Linking Words

, in 1982 it was 2% of materials for recycling and

at the end

Linking Words

of ,

era

Add an article

the era

show examples

it had 45% of

items

Use synonyms

for refurbishment.

In addition

Linking Words

, the

last

Linking Words

material is plastic which remained unchanged during the period.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, the majority of these pieces were not included in the recycling process.