The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two diagrams indicate the investment portfolios of a local government in 2010 and 2015.
Overall
, a significant amount of money went into 3 main sectors: education, healthcare and pensions with just a slight shrinkage over the years, Linking Words
while
defence, welfare and other categories accounted for the least expense of the regime.
Schooling and medical treatment cost the authority most when they made up for respectively 24% and 21% in 2010 Linking Words
then
showed a modest decrease of 3% and 1% in the next 5 years. At the same time, retirement funds were unchanged throughout the observed period at 19%, occupying third place.
Regarding the remaining sectors, the fourth place belonged to security with 17% at the beginning yet had reduced considerably to just 14% in 2015. Linking Words
This
reallocation targeted leveraging the well-being of the residents and finance when both two areas grew up to 5% to reach correspondingly 13% and 8% Linking Words
at the end
of the given duration. Meanwhile, the expenditure for the rest parts containing transportation, recreation and others was trivial and was even cut down from a total of 6% to just 3%.Linking Words
Submitted by nhatducmo on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.