In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which do you think is appropriate in today's world?

People have different views with regard to the content of

education

.

While

some may argue that the government should put emphasis on professional subjects in order to enhance competitiveness, I strongly agree that it is significant to supply

students

with general

education

in

this

generation. On the one hand, so fierce is competition that most parents insist that

education

should be dedicated to improving youngsters’ ability to develop a better career path. As we know, a number of nations, inclusive of Korea and Japan, have adjusted their compulsory courses with more expertise,

such

as chemistry exhibitions, mathematics contests, and English communication classes. In

this

case,

students

can not only enhance their edges but

also

foster their abilities to cope with worldwide challenges.

Nevertheless

, in my point of view, I consider that career-oriented

education

can be drawn in university schooling. With exam-oriented

education

, most

students

do not make sure what they are interested in or which fields they possess talent.

According to

BBC’s research, over 75% of graduates do not know what they want to do after school

education

. In

this

context, if the government provide wide-ranged subjects to teenagers, they can take advantage of these opportunities to explore their interests and gifts. Afterwards, it would lead to long-term influence on them. In conclusion,

although

globalization accelerates competition between different countries, the government cannot ignore the importance of wide-ranged general

education

. With

this

method,

students

can explore their gifts and take advantage of them in their future careers.