Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Charity

is being used by many schools as an extracurricular

program

and many children consider it a necessary experience for high

school

, but I think it is not appropriate to include it in the

program

at

this

age. and I will explain

this

disagreement later. ..

First,

let's talk about the cost of

charity

events

first,

and they don't usually come cheap; A typical example is the rescue of the Central region, which required 178 billion VND for reconstruction. Giving is a good thing but look at the fact that not all

students

in the

school

have the health and money to participate. And

above all

, before the age of 18, we still have to depend on our parents and are not old enough to take responsibility for what we do.

Therefore

,

this

activity we should volunteer to do when we are adults, knowing how to calculate everything properly.

Second,

when we turned 16, the high

school

schedule was no longer as light and comfortable as before, but a dense schedule with extra lessons until late at night. It's a time for college prep, a collision with the world, and certainly a time for almost non-existent philanthropy.

Although

this

program

is considered necessary, it is only for elementary and middle schools that have enough time to arrange, and high

school

students

should only be at the voluntary level. In conclusion, after presenting personal views,

charity

is the right way for people to connect and share, but we can't force

students

to do homework because, after all,

charity

is like that. If we are able and willing to do it,

that is

true

charity

.

Therefore

, the inclusion of unpaid activities in the general

program

is something that I feel is not suitable for the age of

students

.