Some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries with help that is not financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Whenever a poor nation is hit by calamity, the
government
and various organizations all over the world support it.
However
, critics think that the well-off nation should distribute gifts in kind
instead
of monetary endowment. I agree with
this
although
there are a few acceptions two reasons in favour of the idea and an exemption is explained below
along with
a conclusion.
Firstly
, poor nations usually have corrupt governments which do not spend national
funds
as well as
monetary allocation from ally countries for the welfare of their subject.
As a consequence
of
this
capitalistic grants do not reach the targeted area.
That is
why people urge ally countries and charity organizations to provide basic necessities to beneficiaries.
For example
, various local newspapers reported that flood-hit areas in Pakistan did not receive all the relief
funds
allocated by Uno in 2022. All in all,
instead
of giving financial support to suffers it is better to provide basic commodities.
Secondly
, dependent nations have Medicare infrastructure and weak local body systems unable to fulfil the needs of people. As elected mayors do not get enough
funds
from the federal
government
, which is why they are unable to develop efficient infrastructure in their town,
for example
, roads, railways, transportation, sewer, etc.
Consequently
, fellow citizens and charity organizations prefer to supply relief products like food medicines tents.
For example
, almost all of my friends and family members denoted
aid
items and fiscal
funds
to a local charity
instead
of provisional and central
government
fundraising camps. In a nutshell, people do not have trust in their
government
and infrastructure which is why they are more likely to help their fellow nationals personally
instead
of relying on local bodies. It can be concluded that relief
aid
is inevitable but financial
aid
cannot be ignored when needed. As distribution of
aid
supplies decreases the chance of fraudulence it is better than fiscal support. Nations across the globe should join hands to help deprived countries either way.
Submitted by aimenmalik2021 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: