top priority of businesses is making money, and they do not need to have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Most of the business is concentrating on making profits and they do not have to take any public responsibilities.

This

essay will disagree with the given statement. One of my primary reason related to disagreeing with the given reason is that when companies tend to maximize their profits, they will probably construct more branches by wiping out some forests for places. The consequence of

this

action could lead to a sequence of disastrous events

such

as more solidified floods, parched lands and erosion of soil.

Furthermore

, when enterprises decide to ascend the number of factories, they could run a higher risk of solidifying climate change. To be more specific, smoke from industrial facilities was contaminated by carbon dioxide which possesses enough heat to destroy the Ozon's surface. Another considerable cause of

this

concept is that waste from factories almost bumps directly into the sea, lakes and Greeks which could eliminate marine habitats and increase the rate of water-borne diseases infection. Not only water-borne diseases, but civilians will

also

probably experience a higher risk of contracting air-borne diseases of the enormous amount of smoke surrounding our planet. Some hypotheses that were given are that humanity could witness the galaxy in the sky at night but the smoke from both living and especially from industrial activities constituted a glaze of vapour and chemical impurities. Taking everything into account, making money without taking note of social responsibilities will form a paradox with moral standards. With the list of negative sides for lacking of social responsibility, enterprises must take it seriously to conserve our life and our planet.