People believe that some individuals are born with leadership skills, while others think that leadership skills can be made. Discuss both views and give your idea.

The views are different when it comes to

leadership

. some individuals believe that it is an inborn talent

while

others gravitate toward the point that it can be learned. In the upcoming paragraphs, I intend to discuss both views.

To begin

with,

leadership

is an abstract concept which has not existed in books. It is related to the parents' DNA that can be triggered in their later generations and at no time can

people

become impressive persons by taking courses.

For instance

, there were some who had significant effects on societies without enrolling on any classes

such

as Gandhi, an Indian

leader

.

Moreover

, Some children in kindergartens and primary schools start showing brilliant

leadership

abilities by giving out instructions and elaborating on tasks to their peers.Those young children who can show the relevant characteristics without being taught or guided are more likely to be valued being born with

instead

of being trained with the skills.

However

, from other perspectives including me,

such

skills require to be learned practically. A charismatic

leader

is someone who can overcome challenges by implementing various scenarios.

That is

why, some abilities including strategic management must be gained.

Hence

, only can

people

become successful leaders when they are guided. As an illustrative example, a vast majority of successful

people

who had been effective leaders graduated from universities.

To sum up

,

Although

many support the view that folk are born with

leadership

skills, many refute

this

and strongly believe that

people

should attend universities in order to become a

leader

because not only do

people

educated in a wholesale manner, but every crucial factor of being

leader

are covered at universities.