Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is frequently argued that budgets should be allocated to
railways
rather than conventional highways. Despite the fact that
roads
are
also
beneficial in urban areas, I entirely agree with
this
position. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my position regarding
this
viewpoint.
First,
the majority of scholars assert that
railway
conveyance is faster than automobiles and road vehicles.
In other words
, trains and underground
systems
can move significantly quicker than cars on the road and can transport a large number of passengers.
As a result
, there is less rail
traffic
, making
railway
systems
more manageable.
For instance
,
as a result
of the construction of a subway system in Tehran, which was able to transport a large number of people each day,
traffic
decreased significantly,
whereas
some urban planners believed that developing and enhancing Tehran's
roads
in order to solve the
traffic
problem would be extremely costly and time-consuming.
In addition
to being faster than automobiles, constructing a
railway
system in large
cities
is less expensive and simpler. It appears that building
railways
will be less expensive and take less time than constructing new
roads
in
cities
.
Secondly
, the
railway
system is more environmentally favourable, emitting fewer air pollutants because the majority of trains are powered by electricity.
In other words
, because cars burn fossil fuels, they produce a lot of harmful gases,
such
as Carbon dioxide, that pollute the air and,
due to
the Greenhouse effect, raise the temperature of the planet,
whereas
trains and underground
systems
today rely primarily on electricity, which is emission-free and completely clear. Recent surveys and research have shown,
for instance
, that the development of
railway
systems
in certain
cities
has substantially reduced air pollution in those
cities
, as fewer people use private automobiles and,
consequently
, the amount of pollutants decreases. In conclusion, regardless of the merits of
roads
, I believe that governments should focus on developing
railways
rather than constructing new
roads
because
railways
are faster, cheaper, and more environmentally favourable than road
systems
.
Additionally
, it has positive effects on
traffic
control and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Submitted by yavari1993 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: