Some believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or two valuable to be shared freely discuss both the views and give your opinion.

There are split opinions regarding how much
data
should be revealed to laymen. Few suggest maximum information must be disclosed
whereas
some opined had certain stats are highly valuable to be discussed publicly. I believe only limited information should be shared. My opinion
along with
both the views are explained henceforth. There is a school of thought who believe that sharing complete
data
will not only create transparency but will
also
build trust between the two parties.
For example
, if a business firm explains the entire business model to their employees
then
they are more likely to work dedicatedly which will directly result in increased sales.
Besides
this
, people these days are keen on knowing the background scientific research of the product they use.
Hence
, to ensure that consumers' curiosity is satisfied and they
further
purchase the commodity, businesses are now providing as much
data
as possible.
Apart from
this
, academic institutions provide extra knowledge to their students to make sure that they succeed with flying colours in a particular exam.
However
, a host of people assert that some knowledge is too crucial and if it is shared openly it might bring disastrous outcomes.
For instance
either discussing or publishing
data
on nuclear weapons can lead to unhealthy manipulation of it.
Thus
, can put the world's safety at risk.
Moreover
, giving up all details of scientific research studies too possess a huge threat to mankind.
This
is because research studies can be used to make biological weapons
such
as modified viruses and other microbes, if fallen into the wrong hands.
Finally
, companies tend to keep their important details secret to prevent forgery
as well as
hefty losses.
For example
, if the funding details of a company go public there are high chance that competitors might manipulate it.
Thus
to conclude
, we can say
although
keeping things transparent can gain the trust of consumers for various business tycoons
while
academic institutes can help students obtain the best grades, the fact that sharing some pivotal
data
on nuclear
as well as
biological weapons can cause danger to the entire human race.
Therefore
, I believe only limited information should be shared.
Submitted by chehlsychristie947 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • information dissemination
  • knowledge transfer
  • open-source
  • intellectual property
  • competitive edge
  • innovation
  • democratization of knowledge
  • sensitive information
  • data security
  • ethical standards
  • collaboration
  • privacy protection
What to do next:
Look at other essays: