Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, some sectors of society believe that huge investments are being made in order to repair and conserve old
buildings
, which brings the idea that it may be better to demolish them and replace them with modern ones. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with
this
, as demolishing and rebuilding a new building would cost much more money, without thinking about what would governments do to relocate residents in the meantime.
To begin
with, if we are considering cultural patrimony, usually they are old
buildings
because they are part of our history, which does not make sense at all to demolish them as we would be knocking down our own history and culture.
For instance
, there are beautiful and enormous historical
buildings
in Europe that are now museums, being critical to preserving cultural knowledge.
This
means that taking these
buildings
down because they are too old and expensive, would not make any sense for humankind's cultural preservation.
In addition
to
this
, if we are thinking of residential
buildings
, it is a fact that the majority of the
buildings
are old, which is equal to demolishing hundreds of homes, which implies much more money than taking care of them, without considering that all the people who live there need to be relocated in the meantime.
For example
, it is known that Russia and other ex-soviet countries still concentrate an enormous number of
buildings
from the middle and late 1900s, which conducts to a massive population living in these places, being impossible to make a complete renewal for
such
a population.
This
clarifies how crazy would be to have
this
process done. In conclusion, even if some people think that looking after and repairing old
buildings
cost too much money, it is not as expensive compared to demolishing and remaking them. Just thinking about the massive investment that
this
would take and the people who would need to be relocated, gives an idea of the complexity of
this
matter.
That is
why I believe that it is preferable to keep investing in their conservation
while
other
buildings
are being constructed in anther available places.
Submitted by rominaprioletta90 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Preservation
  • Restoration
  • Demolition
  • Architectural heritage
  • Cultural significance
  • Tourist attraction
  • Urban landscape
  • Sustainability
  • Conservation
  • Economic benefits
  • Historical landmarks
  • Urban renewal
  • Infrastructure
  • Maintenance costs
  • Modern amenities
  • Building regulations
  • Community identity
  • Heritage conservation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: