Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Supporters of fixed punishments argue that having set consequences for specific crimes ensures fairness and consistency in the legal system. If every person who commits the crime receives the same sentence, it removes bias or discrimination from judicial decisions. If someone gets 12 years or more for murder, the judge cannot choose to reduce the sentence for anyone.
Moreover
Linking Words
, fixed punishments can serve as a strong deterrent, because potential criminals will know that their sentences will never be reduced Considering circumstances and motivation
On the other hand
Linking Words
, many argue that the context of the crime must be considered. Two people might commit the same crime for entirely different reasons — one out of greed and the other out of desperation or coercion.
For example
Linking Words
, a person who steals food to feed their starving children should not be punished as harshly as someone who steals for personal gain.
This
Linking Words
view emphasizes justice over strict equality, suggesting that a judge should have the flexibility to assess the criminal’s intentions, background, and other surrounding factors when deciding on a sentence My opinion
While
Linking Words
fixed punishments can make the legal system more uniform, I believe that judges should be allowed discretion to consider the circumstances of each case. A rigid system might result in injustice, especially in complex situations where the offender’s actions
were
Wrong verb form
are
show examples
influenced by hardship or mental illness. A balanced approach, where there are general sentencing guidelines but
also
Linking Words
room for judicial interpretation, is likely the most effective and fair.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
Strengthen your points in the body paragraphs with more detailed examples and explanations.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ensure clear transitions between ideas to enhance the flow of the essay.
Task Achievement
The essay presents a balanced discussion of the topic, addressing both views effectively.
Coherence and Cohesion
The introduction and conclusion effectively frame the argument, contributing to a clear overall structure.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • fixed punishments
  • consistency
  • predictability
  • deter crime
  • potential offenders
  • streamline
  • judicial process
  • bias
  • corruption
  • complexity
  • human behavior
  • circumstances
  • justice system
  • intent
  • remorse
  • socio-economic background
  • rehabilitate offenders
  • recidivism rates
  • flexible punishment systems
  • inconsistencies
  • perceived injustices
  • public trust
What to do next:
Look at other essays: