Long distant flights uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Long-distance
flights
are known to use significant amounts of
fuel
, causing alarming levels of
pollution
.
This
has sparked a debate as to whether non-essential
flights
should be discouraged rather than limiting the use of
cars
.
While
I agree to some extent with the notion of curbing unnecessary air travel, I believe that a more comprehensive approach is needed. Starting with the
fuel
consumption of planes, it is indeed a well-established fact that long-haul
flights
consume vast amounts of
fuel
compared to
cars
. To illustrate
this
point, a single flight from New York to London can consume
fuel
equivalent to a car's consumption over several months.
This
excessive
fuel
usage leads to considerable environmental
pollution
, which justifies the calls for restricting non-essential
flights
.
However
, it's essential to consider the broader context.
Although
planes consume more
fuel
on a per-trip basis, the sheer number of
cars
on the road still makes them a substantial source of
pollution
.
According to
the World Health Organization, air
pollution
from
cars
contributes to millions of premature deaths annually. Limiting car use,
therefore
, should not be entirely disregarded.
Instead
, a combination of strategies including promoting public transportation, carpooling, and adopting electric vehicles should be implemented alongside restrictions on non-essential
flights
.
While
curtailing non-essential
flights
seems like a valid approach, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Consider the remote regions where air travel is the only viable option or business travellers for whom flying is an essential part of their job. For these individuals, categorizing
flights
as non-essential is problematic. In conclusion,
while
limiting non-essential
flights
is a step in the right direction, focusing solely on
this
measure would overlook the broader issue of transportation-related
pollution
.
Submitted by PattonCharles0503 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: