In many parts of the world and throughout the history,governments have moved their capitals.Discuss potential problems and benefits?Say whether you would be in favor of moving your capital?

The capital

city

is usually an over-populated area in a country and most of the historical events from the past had occurred there. A lot of nations are moving their capital to another place for several reasons.

This

essay will discuss the possible pros and cons of

this

action and will provide my opinion.

To begin

, the primary reason why the state relocates their

city

is because of the idea that they might discover a hidden gem and develop that certain place for a prosperous land. To explain

this

further

, the redevelopment of a new

city

could spark investors' interest since everything would be inexpensive as the demand is not there yet;

therefore

,

this

would help the economy of the country. An example can be seen in one of the less affluent countries, Thailand, their previous capital was Ayutthaya and eventually moved to Bangkok, which attracted several nations to invest and now has become one of the thriving countries in Southeast Asia.

On the other hand

, the negative impact that

this

could bring the state is historical loss and economic disruption. By ,

this

I mean that since most of the past events happened in the main

city

, they have served as cultural memories and trademarks to the residents and foreigners.

Moreover

, the citizens in the area will lose their jobs or they may be forced to work away from their families. Take the Philippines

for instance

, from Quezon

City

the officials decided to change it to Manila, and because of

this

, most people don't know the historical events that occurred in Quezon. In conclusion, the resettlement of the metropolis could improve the economic situation of a country by redeveloping undiscovered places.

Although

, I believe that the history of a nation is a vital cultural identity that could

last

for a long period of time

as well as

the potential loss of the workforce would greatly affect the stability of a state. It seems to me that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits in

this

situation.