Some people say that time and money spent on music classes in schools aren’t necessary; instead, children should be learning a useful subject such as science and computer. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.

Some people argue that it is vital to invest in the education of young students to acquire useful

subjects

like

science

and

computer

rather than devoting time and money to music courses . I completely agree that children should learn useful

subjects

instead

of music.

To begin

with, learning useful courses

such

as

science

and

computer

can have a great impact on children's future careers. When these young students have sufficient knowledge about these

subjects

, they would possess a solid foundation in these

subjects

.

This

might be beneficial for their future job.

For instance

, if young people start learning computers subject at a young age, it will be more convenient to build on

this

knowledge in college.

Thus

, they will be fully equipped with in-depth knowledge enhancing their work prospects

due to

their competence. Another reason why learning practical

subjects

is beneficial for children is their mental development. Starting to study

subjects

like

science

and

computer

can broaden their horizons and offer them a wide range of skills which are useful in their daily lives. To illustrate

this

point, these

subjects

could boost their critical thinking ability,

as well as

problem-solving.

This

is because these

subjects

require a high level of thinking ability, and

thus

it is better to invest time and money in these

subjects

since they will acquire a strong grasp of these

subjects

, unlike teenagers or adult students. In conclusion, I firmly agree that it is significant for young people to focus on learning practical

subjects

such

as

science

and

computer

rather than music.

This

is

due to

the positive impact on their future jobs and their mental improvement.